Did you know Google is actually as old as 1913? Did you know it contains many symbols and secret meanings, and was started by English spies as a code breaking system? Just kidding about those last two points. But Google really is as old as 1913, that is, the GOOGLE BOOK.
What is this book? Remember the Jabberwocky from Alice In Wonderland? Well, English economist Vincent Cartwright Vickers wrote a children's book full of all these made up creatures (mostly birds), called 'The Google Book'. It was in a similar Victorianesque, well-spun, nonsensical yet imaginative fashion as the Jabberwocky (and other creations of 'Wonderland' author Lewis Carroll). I remember having this book as a kid, and getting totally tripped out by it. Luckily, there is another blog I found which pretty much reprints the WHOLE BOOK in online form, at :
http://blogoscoped.com/googlebook/
No, it's not as vivid as the actual book. I've been noticing more and more lately that real book pages REALLY do stand out so much more than stuff on a computer screen. But hey, it'll have to do for now.
PS. I wonder if there was any influence on Google getting it's name from the book, even subconsciously?
JUMP TO BOTTOM/BLOG ARCHIVE
Thursday, January 31, 2013
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Reincarnated: Junk Mail Spoof (originally posted November 2012)
Hi,
We sell minerals, fertilizer, chemicals, adult diapers, and outdated videogames. And market feedback is fine. We are manufacturer. Why don't you compare the quality and let's discuss the possibility of getting the business work?
Regards,
David
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Reincarnated: Shadowcatchers (originally posted November 2012)
Monday, January 28, 2013
Sunday, January 27, 2013
Reincarnated: Proof You Are Now Living In The Matrix (originally posted September 2012)
Around the turn of the century, a trend has been peaking and building fast. Technology has become more portable and affordable, especially in the realm of communications (think: tricked out cellphones, iPads etc.) Spreading like a virus, we see more and more people turn towards their pocket (or mounted in-ear) devices, gazes cast down at the buttons and screens, or far off into space. I pass a bus stop and see about 20 people ALL staring at their little techno contraptions. It seems a truck could drive by carrying a giant missile and they wouldn't notice. Mind you, these contraptions have made our lives fun and 'effective' in some ways, but we draw more and more into our shells and talk out loud less. Even if we talk a lot to friends and family, there is something to be said for the quality of it. If 80% of communication's meaning is determined by body language, and we look at abbreviated text on screens all the time, much is lost in translation. Some humanity or 'organic' quality is lost. The voices deep within and outside ourselves are unheard, and we forget to pay attention to our surroundings. We append ourselves to the machines, all part of the greater Machine, slowly becoming like out of touch zombies. Does any of this sound familiar beyond what it just is? Think of the characteristics. If we take it far enough.....
Now what's it going to be? The red pill or blue pill?
Saturday, January 26, 2013
Reincarnated: Cool Ways To Die (originally posted August 2012)
1. die laughing
2.death by chocolate
3. falling into a volcano
4. killed by a rock and roll noise blast
5. sex
6. cowboy showdown
7. guillotine
8. samurai decapitation
9. crazy stunts
10. hit by a meteor
*I'm sure there are many many more cool ways to die, but how morbidly engrossed do you want me to get? Yeesh. Leave that for a 'sequel post' in the future (provided we don't get hit by a gigantic meteorite...har har har).
2.death by chocolate
Like eating too much and tweaking out and going out cold prolly. I dunno if something like drowning in choco would be fun, drowning in any substance would suck. |
3. falling into a volcano
As a tribal sacrifice? Perhaps to skydive towards it? Anyhow, the heat should be so hardcore that you'd kind of vaporize instantly. |
4. killed by a rock and roll noise blast
5. sex
6. cowboy showdown
Go out in a blaze of bullet riddled glory! |
7. guillotine
You'd die like instantly, pretty painless (likely at least). And you could pretend you are the French Aristocracy from way back...or I dunno, it's just cool. |
8. samurai decapitation
9. crazy stunts
Be they Evel Knievel style or whatever, the sky's the limit. Just pray to die on impact. |
10. hit by a meteor
Imagine the heavy sucker above landing on your head like one of God's flaming turds. BOOM! Dramatic and cosmic. Sounds good in an obituary too. |
Friday, January 25, 2013
Thursday, January 24, 2013
Reincarnated: Problems of the World Today (originally posted August 2012)
note: this is some mini essay I wrote awhile back. Maybe it's just more bs, but I'd thought I'd post it.
Strangely enough, population is exploding in developing countries, despite all the famine, war, disease and so forth. There are numerous complex reasons behind this. For example, many developing countries have backwoods type infrastructures, and the rural lifestyle demands many kids to help. Many areas do not have access to birth control or have taboos against it. Remember also there is a difference between having a pulse and barely getting by vs. a good standard of living. People can be alive with the population growing, but their lives might not be high quality, there can be much suffering involved.
A lot of these cultures have animistic beliefs or types of beliefs where their land is very much alive itself and to be respected- to never take more than you give from it. Models of common theistic beliefs (ie the Abrahamic religious traditions) over many years have helped to create an image of nature being more dead..and as a resource to exploit. It is not necessarily religion itself of this type that is the main culprit, however the religion can serve as a bedrock or excuse for this view. Thus trees are not vibrant and full of living energy and spirits, but dead wood to be turned into paper, in example. Even aside from religious belief, Western style materialism and industrialism have greatly contributed to the decimation of nature. In other words, over time an entire culture is engrained with prevailing beliefs, religious or otherwise, to give them ideas on what is 'right' or 'wrong', and many modern industrialized cultures are so far removed from nature that they feel it is ok to destroy it. It is especially ok if you don't directly starve as a consequence, since another land base is exploited.
In places where people cling to older and tribal lifestyles (that tend to respect nature), hard choices are faced. Getting kicked off land against their will so outsiders can exploit the resources is a common refrain. Rural to urban migration ensues as many try to find better luck 'in the city', though the luck is not commonly found. Factory workers can make next to nothing in a day and all too often face horrible work conditions, but they feel it is a situation better THAN nothing. Some remain in the countryside to try agricultural type work in an effort just to survive. Farmers face cash crop problems centering around demand. If there is low demand for their product, they won't sell a lot of it and won't get paid much for it. High demand is actually a curse too, since it creates lots of competition, and only the lowest prices for the crop are wanted by buyers. If farmers in developing countries want to sell a high-demand product AT ALL, then they have to lower the price as much as possible or be beat by the next competitor. Natural disasters can get in the way of crop growing as well. Drought, floods, hurricanes and all manner of storms, you name it. What is surprising is that many natural disasters are more man made than is initially thought. Global warming and climate change have had strong roots in pollution created by man. More erratic weather patterns tend to set in. Deforestation and overgrazing livestock can cause desertification, mudslides, and many other problems. The interference of man can create species invasion in places it is not naturally meant to occur, thus disrupting fragile ecosystems. Then there are disasters more apparently manmade. Nuclear reactor meltdowns, dams creating drought (or breaking and flooding), oil refineries exploding or oil spills, chemical spills, and many more are instances of this!
Overpopulation is an obvious and large problem in the world. In first world countries, people consume enormous amounts of resources and create incredulous amounts of waste. In third world countries, way less is consumed or wasted, however the consumption and pollution is still there. Because population continues to grow even in developing countries, there are shortages of food and other necessities to go around. The demand for all of it is not just from the locals, privileged countries exploit and take what they want from these less fortunate areas. That alone can create shortage. In theory, if things were done right there should be enough food and commodities for living to go around for everyone. The more powerful and rich countries take greedily like blustering bullies, and even within the poor countries there are corrupted forces (usually their own governments or say rebel militias) that will take things by force if need be. Dirt poor countries are like giant versions of ghettos in advanced countries- there are more problems with power struggle and crime among the obvious problems of poverty and sickness and hunger. Entire wars and genocides seem to easily blow up in countries where control and stability was never a luxury to begin with. Refugees who flee from these conflicts bring with them the problems they initially faced but in new areas.
Food and medical aid programs help, but also create a sort of ratchet effect. The more the poor are sponsored and helped, the more they thrive, then they develop to a point where the need is twice as great as before because less people have died of starvation and sickness. I'm not coldly stating that they all deserve to die, just presenting the outline of a 'bottomless pit' type problem. Because they, and even members of the developed countries, grow and grow, but the environment and resources dwindle more and more. We will all literally thrive to death on this planet!
Strangely enough, population is exploding in developing countries, despite all the famine, war, disease and so forth. There are numerous complex reasons behind this. For example, many developing countries have backwoods type infrastructures, and the rural lifestyle demands many kids to help. Many areas do not have access to birth control or have taboos against it. Remember also there is a difference between having a pulse and barely getting by vs. a good standard of living. People can be alive with the population growing, but their lives might not be high quality, there can be much suffering involved.
A lot of these cultures have animistic beliefs or types of beliefs where their land is very much alive itself and to be respected- to never take more than you give from it. Models of common theistic beliefs (ie the Abrahamic religious traditions) over many years have helped to create an image of nature being more dead..and as a resource to exploit. It is not necessarily religion itself of this type that is the main culprit, however the religion can serve as a bedrock or excuse for this view. Thus trees are not vibrant and full of living energy and spirits, but dead wood to be turned into paper, in example. Even aside from religious belief, Western style materialism and industrialism have greatly contributed to the decimation of nature. In other words, over time an entire culture is engrained with prevailing beliefs, religious or otherwise, to give them ideas on what is 'right' or 'wrong', and many modern industrialized cultures are so far removed from nature that they feel it is ok to destroy it. It is especially ok if you don't directly starve as a consequence, since another land base is exploited.
In places where people cling to older and tribal lifestyles (that tend to respect nature), hard choices are faced. Getting kicked off land against their will so outsiders can exploit the resources is a common refrain. Rural to urban migration ensues as many try to find better luck 'in the city', though the luck is not commonly found. Factory workers can make next to nothing in a day and all too often face horrible work conditions, but they feel it is a situation better THAN nothing. Some remain in the countryside to try agricultural type work in an effort just to survive. Farmers face cash crop problems centering around demand. If there is low demand for their product, they won't sell a lot of it and won't get paid much for it. High demand is actually a curse too, since it creates lots of competition, and only the lowest prices for the crop are wanted by buyers. If farmers in developing countries want to sell a high-demand product AT ALL, then they have to lower the price as much as possible or be beat by the next competitor. Natural disasters can get in the way of crop growing as well. Drought, floods, hurricanes and all manner of storms, you name it. What is surprising is that many natural disasters are more man made than is initially thought. Global warming and climate change have had strong roots in pollution created by man. More erratic weather patterns tend to set in. Deforestation and overgrazing livestock can cause desertification, mudslides, and many other problems. The interference of man can create species invasion in places it is not naturally meant to occur, thus disrupting fragile ecosystems. Then there are disasters more apparently manmade. Nuclear reactor meltdowns, dams creating drought (or breaking and flooding), oil refineries exploding or oil spills, chemical spills, and many more are instances of this!
Overpopulation is an obvious and large problem in the world. In first world countries, people consume enormous amounts of resources and create incredulous amounts of waste. In third world countries, way less is consumed or wasted, however the consumption and pollution is still there. Because population continues to grow even in developing countries, there are shortages of food and other necessities to go around. The demand for all of it is not just from the locals, privileged countries exploit and take what they want from these less fortunate areas. That alone can create shortage. In theory, if things were done right there should be enough food and commodities for living to go around for everyone. The more powerful and rich countries take greedily like blustering bullies, and even within the poor countries there are corrupted forces (usually their own governments or say rebel militias) that will take things by force if need be. Dirt poor countries are like giant versions of ghettos in advanced countries- there are more problems with power struggle and crime among the obvious problems of poverty and sickness and hunger. Entire wars and genocides seem to easily blow up in countries where control and stability was never a luxury to begin with. Refugees who flee from these conflicts bring with them the problems they initially faced but in new areas.
Food and medical aid programs help, but also create a sort of ratchet effect. The more the poor are sponsored and helped, the more they thrive, then they develop to a point where the need is twice as great as before because less people have died of starvation and sickness. I'm not coldly stating that they all deserve to die, just presenting the outline of a 'bottomless pit' type problem. Because they, and even members of the developed countries, grow and grow, but the environment and resources dwindle more and more. We will all literally thrive to death on this planet!
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Reincarnated: Why I'm quitting Facebook (originally posted August 2012)
*Note: whenever I say 'Crackbook' in this, it means Facebook. I'm mostly going to use genius hilarious pics from Cracked.com ...
Why did I ever bother to use it in the first place? I'll tell you why. I came to a friend's house after being out of town for a long time. It seemed all traces of him and his family were gone and his house was overrun by drunken frat boys. I knew another friend who'd probably know of his whereabouts, and I found this other guy's Crackbook page, but they would not let me send him a message unless I had a Crackbook account. So I jimmied up a quick BS one full of silly misinformation. Before I knew it, I thought it wouldn't hurt to 'add friends' and actually try to use the damn thing. Well, I gave it MORE than enough trial, a shocking 4 years. Has it really been that long? It's now time for me to pull the plug on this thing. The fact I used it first and THEN judged gives this a helluva lot more credibility. Keep in mind if Crackbook works great for you, fine. I'm not trying to force you to bail. People are different.What I am trying to do is explain why I'm going to shut down my account.
First of all, what is the appeal? Some have called Crackbook a glorified yearbook or popularity contest. Another way to see it is a hybrid of many popular programs and sites and applications that have proven useful to people in recent years. When the internet was pretty young, email caught on quick. Then live chat. Then there were special sites for reconnecting with old friends and schoolmates, for dating or social networking, or online photo albums people could post to. Blogs got pretty popular, where people could have an online journal about anything from their business to their family history. Well, Crackbook has taken all these things and more and rolled it into one neat package. Great eh?
Well in many ways not really, and you'll find out soon enough reading this. It becomes a case of do we blame how society has become for things like Crackbook, or things like Crackbook for how society's become? It's supposed to be social, but ironically it is very antisocial in many ways. It keeps us in bubbles instead of breaking free.
People are always so 'busy' and in a hurry to get nowhere. Quality has been severely diminished in favor of quantity, in terms of life itself, also in terms of our communication and how we relate to one another. An exaggerated caricature of the modern man (or woman) is this: Be a workaholic. Make lots of money, spend mostly on unnecessary things. Constantly carry a mobile device around to check Crackbook, Twitter (or Twatter as I like to call it) or any other number of popular 'social' websites. Make a log of every little thing you eat, every thing you do, every place you go. Spill out details of who you are to the point the info is exploding across the wires. Because this is very convenient see, for marketers or governments or god knows who else to tap into. I'm not speaking as some paranoiac conspiracy theorist, it just seems sensible that the world doesn't need to know every time you wipe your ass clean. In the very least, it's dreadfully boring. It perpetuates the star syndrome where everyone becomes their own narcissistic celebrity in their own little world, all other things to orbit around them. Things become fragmented and atomized...we pull further and further inside ourselves but instead of using it to bring out the divine within and gain amazing insight into life, we just hide in our shells. Lonely, we find a way to reach out our tendrils of communication to somebody, anybody who will listen. And what better vehicle than some of these 'social' websites like Crackbook?
FRIENDS:
It's kinda like this. One good friend is all you need. One kickass friend. Imagine hanging out with them old school style, lots of face to face conversation and laughs and doing cool things. To use nourishment as metaphor, think of a hearty and healthy homestyle delicious meal as this high quality relationship. Now, imagine eating a bunch of shitty candies. Sure they seem sweet and nice, but to subsist SOLELY on those? Disastrous. And your health is a big piece of shit, and you still feel an ache to eat, and you eat more and more candies and get depressed. "I don't understand, I have a THOUSAND candies! " In case you haven't guessed, the candies represent more superficial relationships. You ask someone what time it is on the street, the next thing you know you are adding them to your friend list on Crackbook? It doesn't make us selfish or bad to not care about the inner dealings of every single person we meet. It's more natural to care about our closest family and friends, and sure, help out a stranger in need. But we shouldn't have to give a flying fuck what the weatherman ate for breakfast today. To an extent, this shouldn't even matter much in the case of our friends (unless they only ate candies,har har har).
I thought, if I were going to use Crackbook at all, I'd try to do in on my own terms as much as possible. This included trying to stick to a list of friends that I could actually hang out with or talk to. You know, ACTUAL friends! It seems people build a friend list because they are afraid of looking mean by saying no to people they don't care too much about being real friends with. Or, like a scorecard they try to get a high number of friends regardless of the quality of the friendships, perhaps out of loneliness, perhaps to look cooler. There are TWO golden questions you should ask yourself when looking at a friends list:
1.Do I care if I will never see or talk to this person again?
2.If I were in the same town as this person, how often would we hang out?
If you say "YES" to question one and you'd frequently hang out with the person when nearby, chances are they are one of your best friends. In a time before all this technocracy, you'd have a small number of really solid best friends. Guess what? Even now the number will not change much. There is only so much time in a day and you CANNOT hang out with hundreds of people and spend quality time with them face to face constantly, it is mathematically impossible. This is why Crackbook works well because it helps serve the illusion you can hold onto all these relationships through a hyper functional tool. There's probably a REASON you stopped talking to so-and-so from your Grade 2 class. Life is naturally full of impermanence and change. Trying to hold on to every little friendship is like trying to extend the shelf life of an apple by 3 months, it's just trying to fight the universe and nature. A bunch of picture icons and names on a screen that you barely talk to in a REAL way is like an army of fingerpuppets to assuage your social needs. It's plain fucked.
If you say "YES" to question one, but do not hang out often with a person when in the same area, they could still be considered a good friend, but maybe not as good as a best friend.
If you say "YES" to question one and barely ever see this person when in the same area, if you care you should work on staying in contact more. If not, then let go. Come to terms with seeing the person once a year, or never.
Note I say, 'when in the same area', because it is a fair excuse if you are in opposite ends of the globe not to hang out. Provided you were tight though, you would find a way to see each other when close by.
Now, if you say, "NO" to question one, that person should not even be on your friends list, on Crackbook, or anywhere else (your mind ie).
If we are productive in our lives and doing what we are supposed to be doing in harmony with the universe, loneliness vanishes. The need for more friends vs. 'more better' friends dissolves.
It kinda makes me want to lose my lunch a bit when I realize 'friended' and 'unfriended' are treated like actual words now. They sound unbelievably stupid! Did you know there's a place you can click inside of Crackbook, to 'Edit Friends?' Really? That's so great. Editing friends! And there's a friend hunting feature so you can track down friends not on your list and add them. They even make suggestions on the side for friends. Really, I'm so fucking stupid I don't know who my friends actually are? I don't start the friendship until it's official on Crackbook? What about meeting new people online? From experience, it doesn't even come close to working as well as meeting the good ol' fashioned way. In fact it's usually pretty limp and disastrous. I'll actually admit, Crackbook is pretty good for hunting people down, provided they have accounts on it that are listed in a way to be found easily. In fact, if you recall, I originally got an account to hunt a friend down. I found a mutual friend instead, and he told me the gist of where the friend was (who was notoriously anti technology). Then messages didn't go through or something, I never got a # to call my friend or an email or anything. Probably the mutual friend logs on about once a year because he realizes how stupid Crackbook is too. Sometimes it's hard to find someone who's on there 'cos they go by a phony stupid name like I did, it's fun. So many people I reconnected with from my past, and I realized things were so different that a friendship would be pointless.
SYMBIOSIS:
One of the most enduring and insidious aspects of Crackbook is that people become parasitically pair-bonded or patterned to it to the point that they think if they erase their account, they not only lose Crackbook but their ENTIRE SOCIAL LIFE. It's like, Crackbook and your friends are so intertwined that if you 'kill' or 'shoot' Crackbook, your friends go with it.
Know what I say to that? Fuck it! If a friend refuses to contact you or share any part of their life with you outside of the context of Crackbook, were they really a friend to begin with? This is to me the single biggest reason people are afraid to trash their accounts. I really hate the fact that all my social interactions have to have the stamp of approval or wings to fly via a mega corporation started by some dweeb named Mark Zuckerberg.
Mark Zuckerberg. This guy owns your ass. |
E-MAIL/CHAT:
Instead of using another email and chat website, you can use these features built right into Crackbook.
E-mail and messaging itself is a useful tool if you are separated by some distance by your chums. Here's the thing though. You can EASILY pretend you never got their message and stall your reply, or just never reply. Like you could just be too busy ..maybe right?
Or, maybe the message in email form was genuinely lost in a sea of hundreds of other messages or in the spam filter or somehow did not send. So despite the fact that email is supposed to be a futuristic light speed state of the art thing, it is cluttered and ineffective. Sometimes it is as slow as 'snail mail' or traditional letter mail, if the responder chooses a late reply. In the case of messaging, you could just say you were away from the computer or your mobile device.
In any event there are enough excuses to hide behind a safe electronic webbing and no offense should be taken. Let's rewind to the time of old school answering machines on phones. It'd be a bit weird to not respond if response was expected but you could STILL drop the blame on the technology itself ("oh musta erased it by accident"..) or you could still say yr too busy. Now, let's rewind further. You are now walking in the street, and an old friend bumps into you and says hi. If you ignore them, either you are on crack or SO lost in thought you didn't notice, or you are the rudest fucker to walk away, if they are indeed a real friend.
THE WALL...THE FEED...THE MASSES:
One pseudo remedy to the above problem is to post a message on someone's wall. The wall lets you post messages and links and anything of that sort just like the email/messaging, but it is done more publicly on your friend's main page. It's kinda the centerpiece of the whole Crackbook experience. Of course, the poster can adjust privacy settings to determine who does see the post. A further filter is made when the wall's owner can erase things at their discretion, adjust privacy settings themselves, or they could even make it so nobody can post things to their wall unless it's a comment about something they already posted. This can come in handy if people are posting a bunch of dross and filler, and you want to control the topics more. So anyway, all filters and privacy settings aside, if you leave a message on someone's wall and everyone else sees it, that person is going to look like a dick if they don't respond (at least if it's the type of message warranting that). Basically anything you could say in a private message can find it's way to a wall for whatever reason, but is the reason good enough?
The owner of the wall can post their own things too, and this is interesting. Instead of sending individual or even mass emails to check out this thing or that or hear this or that...they can simply post it to a wall. It's one degree less personal and more...lazy. I don't have to email a cool video to a few friends, if they want to see it they have to stumble on it on my wall. It saves me time right?
This kinda touches on the 'lost email syndrome' too because I don't have to risk sending an email and having it be lost. It's THERE on my WALL fuckers, see it? And it can stay as long as I want it to. But then it's really no solution, because , as outlined earlier, there's just not enough time in the day to spend deeply with 1000 friends (or even 50). So the chances are pretty slight that someone is going to go through their entire friend's list and heavily comb over their walls. This is where the news feed feature comes in, it'll display supposedly relevant posts from the recent past . That way you can just stay up to speed on what is CURRENT. Then it's all just like Twitter and blogging, write every little thing down. Sometimes the stuff is really neat to come across. Still, many people don't even have or make the time or carefully scan everything in the news feed. Or, they will, but a lot of it will swing the other way and eat up mountains of time -all just to find out when people flossed their cat or took a big dump (for the most part).
There are two trends I notice on walls, aside from what can be categorized as regular whatever posting. There is something called 'fun stuff' and something called the 'bait'. 'Fun stuff' is where someone gets to the notion of posting almost nothing but silly pictures and posters, the kind that are commonly found on humor sites. It's easy to get people to respond to those and comment and go 'hahaha' as opposed to some boring account of them going to the dentist or something. And even if no one comments or responds, it's such broad material that it's not taken as more personally insulting to be ignored. It could be that the 'fun stuff' poster recognizes the trivial nature of a lot of these social sites, and figures they might as well post trivial yet entertaining stuff vs. a strained attempt at deep meaningful posts about their life. It goes with the territory that it is hard to be so sincere and real over a computer screen..and the people will recognize that.
An example of a 'fun stuff' pic.. |
As far as my wall goes, I always saw it like a whiteboard. You know, someone jots a memo on it or I post some silly video or whatever. Then I wipe it clean after awhile. I don't think if I kept every little thing on it then it would be like keeping sacred museum relics or ancient parchment or whatnot. Enjoy the moment. Appreciate the mandala aspect of things. I do remember all the comments and interaction up in my head, and value them. It's nice to take some pics or write some things down or be a bit sentimental, but if you keep EVERY little thing, ironically you lose the beauty of it. If you love it set it free.. was that it? OR...some friend writes "hey dude I'll be over there soon"...that's great, the message served its purpose, do I really have to keep it up there? I like reducing clutter. Another thing, people could be blinded by the amount of stuff I post, I'd rather just post a few neat little things, take it or leave it, then erase them. Imagine how retarded it would be if all the whiteboards and chalkboards in the world were NEVER ERASED?!
TIMELINE MORPH....THE COLD MACHINE:
The wall has recently morphed into 'timeline'. This has battled the 'whiteboard' concept for me. Now, it's supposed to be more of this 'cherished historical' thing. I just think I'd rather sit with a solid album of photos and tell a friend beside me about them. There's something to be said for SOUL inside of things. The internet can be good for basic research and sending some emails and maybe wasting a bit of time with silliness too. It sure as hell cuts down on paper and physical clutter. But it does nothing to cut out mental clutter, in fact it helps feed it. I believe in balance of all things. So if I'm going to go into 'cherished historical' mode I'm going to hold a jacket my grandpa once wore, or look at pictures of when I was a kid. Not have some corporation allow me to post 'memories' on their servers, and my timeline. I think of computers as being better for functional purposes, not sentimental ones. I'm just a bit traditional in that respect I guess.
Recently, they forced the timeline layout on me. In the past they have 'edited' some things I've posted or listed, completely without my consent. I know there have been privacy leaks and policy changes without people knowing. I REALLY don't go for that shit. In fact this has been a final trigger in my decision to leave Crackbook. For example, I wanted to be poetic and say I was 'married to madness'. Madness was not a real person to them, so I couldn't do it. I said I was from the 'school of hard knocks'. They connected that to a real place and the words themselves are a link that says how many people 'like it' and are 'talking about it' and where it is located. It takes the mystery and fun out of it. I value being creative and liberal, and they stifle the fuck out of it. The LAST place you should go for total honesty is the net. There is also no moral code on Crackbook. My friends know me enough that it's my personality to have fun with silly answers. I don't think Crackbook has business asking for piss samples and getting my blood type and all this info (they haven't REALLY.. I mean it as figure of speech).
Note the creeper in the corner! |
My friends already know who I am, and the silly info is an extension of my character. Some people lie for more devious purposes, like predators. I'm doing it because I recognize the whole thing as fakeass so I might as well have fun putting on my cyber mask. I thought I'd list my email as the one thing that's true for contact purposes. Well, they censored that. See they don't like people using other email from other companies like Hotmail and Gmail, so they convert the address you list into the Facebook one, and a notice just FWDS to your normal email whenever yr Crackbook acc't gets a message. There is a BAR, a % complete bar at the top of my information page, egging me on to fill in more info for them until it reaches 100%.
For what?! I did have fun switching my preferred language to 'Pirate English' under their settings recently. But that is THEIR brand of creativity, not mine. It's just a big frigid corporation that only cares for your needs if you make them money. They put up all these asinine ads to generate revenue. I heard they were BOMBING lately, like their stocks were plummeting. If you don't log on in a while, they send this 'hey here's what you are missing' mail to try to get you back on. Fuck off!
LIKES, POKES, TAGS, APPS, EVENTS ETC.:
Another horrible thing is the concept of 'like'. You can 'like' comments or posts or photos or whatever. You can also 'like' pages linked to businesses, rock bands etc. Someone posts a painting they did, say. Instead of saying 'gee Jim, I really love the way the greens contrast with the fiery reds' you can just click 'like'. That way Jim knows you like it. Once again, an instance of lazy and a step towards the less personal. There is no 'dislike' feature, only 'like'. How's that for freedom of speech? Pah! If you even call it 'speech'. You click a fucking button. "Have you talked to Sarah recently?" "No, but a month ago she clicked 'like' on my one picture of me in a banana suit." It comes again to whether society is becoming stupid first, perpetuating things such as the 'like', or things like Crackbook are making society stupid. It's the same thing on how 'friended' is now a word. We just get lazier and dumber. No, I won't think you are stupid for clicking 'like' for something I posted. I appreciate that you like something that I prolly dig as well. I just hate the idea of the feature.
Some corner ad reads 'Someone I Love Is Dying' with a button to click 'like' underneath..with a tally of all people who ever clicked 'like' in a readout below. WTF does that mean? Communication gets distorted. Do you 'like' the fact there is a support group for people who know the dying? Or do you like the fact the people are dying?? Or someone says, "I'm having a bad day". A friend clicks 'like'. You like they are having a shitty day?! Or is it you like that they are sharing the fact and you sympathize? If you like a band or business, great, you help advertise for them, more or less free. The stupid part is now 'likes' are being used as a serious measuring stick for how successful a band or business is. That's why you always see 'like us on Facebook' in business ads etc. Imagine not having enough investors or not being able to release a single because there are not enough 'likes'? What about all the people who don't use Crackbook? What about the people who clicked just because they felt pressured to do so but don't really care about the cause or the business or watever? Fucking stupid!! I read recently an article about not trusting people who don't have Crackbook accounts as they could be the next serial killer, or in the least highly antisocial etc. What a bunch of crap. They talked about some businesses only hiring people that have Crackbook profiles, that is just the kind of company I DON'T want to work for. Such shallow moronic thinking. They mentioned dating, and that someone without a profile could be more sneaky. Really? I thought it was easier to lie over a Crackbook page than in person!!
There's also a one click feature called 'poke'. This is really lame. It's a digital equivalent of, you know, poking somebody. Just how you can send digital martinis and stuff.Because you might not get the chance to touch them in real life, right ?
The poke joke goes further in that 'poke' has been slang in the past for screwing somebody. I also think it's great when it's someone's birthday.. and it's like 5 pages of people saying 'happy birthday'. They'll look jerky if they 'forget'..but I sure hope many say and do a bit more outside of that wall of the same line over and over. Everything just gets so cheapened. There's an autofiller feature on a lot of websites where you don't even have to type full words anymore!!
Another Crackbook special-you can tag people in videos and photos and notes, as if to say, here, remember you were here? Oh wait, you were too drunk. To me the tagging just adds to the whole collecting info thing, the corporation knowing every this little thing or that. For marketing purposes or something more insidious.
There are a huge number of applications you can add to your Crackbook. Silly little games, finding out how much you resemble a baboon's butt, etc. They often leech as much personal info as they can. Sometimes you even end up getting viruses on your computer. Real great. A lot of the apps exist in better versions outside of Crackbook.
Staging an event. You can create a page to invite people to your 100th bday or whatever. This actually works quite well, one of the few things that do work well within Crackbook as far as I'm concerned.
The only catch? Well, you could just as easily do a similar thing with normal email or watever.
TO CONCLUDE:
I'm sure there are even more stupid things I could talk about relating to Crackbook. I'll leave it at that for now. It's no mistake or coincidence many have wanted to and/or have left Crackbook. I've asked myself, what could I gain and lose by erasing my account?
GAIN:
*A bit less time wasted (though I barely went on before!)
*Added perspective on how I don't need some loser company to be the vehicle for my entire social life
*A stronger emphasis on actually hanging out with friends or sending them direct emails (at 'worst') instead of this discombobulated web or 'look at me, where's your world, throw me a line? who's that?'
*RAW real life. I will be napping beside a stream and doing other things in the real world more often than looking at some crapass screen.
LOSE:
*I won't be as in the loop for a lot of my friends as they post updates and photos. However most of these friends I barely see anyway. If they refuse to actually chill or talk to me outside of Crackbook, their loss, not mine.
*There are a lot of cool pics and vids I could still post, but hey it's not like I can't show these things in other ways. And no one will die if they don't see this thing or that.
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Monday, January 21, 2013
Reincarnated: TOUGH (BADASS) (originally posted July 2012)
I'm so badass, I eat ground glass for breakfast and wash it down with
strong beer. I brush my teeth with hotsauce. I cut my hair with a
weedwhacker and my nails with a chainsaw. I don't have a guard dog, I
have a guard bear. My clothes are made from the hides of extinct and/or
endangered species. I smoke tailpipes and smokestacks 'stead of
cigarettes. I chug motoroil milkshakes. I drill holes thru my head to
better facilitate the thinking process. I pick fights with all the local
biker gang chapters. I use the skulls of serial killers as
paperweights. I sleep in a coffin full of spikes and several inches of
icewater. My chiropractor is a 20 foot Reticulated Python. My
acupuncturist is a hive of Africanized killer bees. I use 100 year old
whiskey pried from the hands of a dead Highland warrior for cologne and
Drano for mouthwash. To donate blood, I get in automotive accidents or
knife fights. To save the environment I slaughter lumberjacks and use
their bones for fertilizer. To feed the hungry I kill rich fat people
and parachute them down in crates to destitute areas of the world. I
lift weights in a junkyard surrounded by rabid dogs. My belt buckle will
bounce away mortar shells and blind you with brilliance. I use a
crowbar for a toothpick. I use common sense. I drive through traffic
jams in a Sherman tank. If a pesky fly buzzes near, I explode it with my
Glock pistol. I like to take baths in lye or swim naked in pools full
of $100 American bills. I stare at the sun for a hobby, and to make sure
my eyes get enough vitamin D. I use the Devil's pitchfork for
gardening. I wrestle alligators, sharks, lions, tigers and gorillas. I
use an Uzi as a paper shredder. My Sunday clothes are the suit JFK got
assassinated in. I pimp out the whoremongers. I don't use a cellphone-I
yell really really hard. I rob banks and flip over Brinks trucks to pay
my taxes. I use gauze from the corpses of cursed Egyptian mummies for
toilet paper. I lifted a monster truck with my toe once. I beat people
up with my eyelashes. But you should see my grandma....she's tougher.
Sunday, January 20, 2013
Reincarnated: Does This Look Like A Street Drug To You? (originally posted July 2012)
Upon one of my raids to the local Chinese supermarket I got a tiny package of tubes full of white powder with a horse logo. The only words in English were 'HORSE trade mark' and 'Vanillin'. The rest I recognized to be Vietnamese words. So I thought, ok, like vanilla sugar tubes for desserts, or something.
If you have ever done any outdoor survival training, you'll possibly know about doing something called the edibility test. You start by visually inspecting and smelling a plant to deem if it seems edible. If that's cool, then you rub a sample of a plant on your wrist or under your armpit. If there's no rash or reaction you progress through touching the plant to the corner of your mouth, lips, tip of tongue, under tongue, and so forth. You give at least a good 15 seconds for each step. Finally, you ingest a tiny portion on an empty stomach and wait several hours. If there is any burning, bitterness, or any other number of unpleasant sensations at any of these stages you must DISCARD the plant and assume it is potentially dangerous.
Imagine my surprise when I thought I'd be tasting vanilla flavored sugar and my tongue burned and recoiled from a strong bitterness! I was like, whoa, maybe I should look this stuff up so I don't use it the wrong way. Of course, if it could be so dangerous, why would it openly be sold in markets like that and FDA approved and such? The internet is a strange place to get knowledge, but sometimes it may give you more concurrent info than some dusty old Encyclopedia Britannica. First, what IS vanillin? It is NOT vanilla sugar even though it looks like it. Natural vanilla beans have hundreds of chemical compounds in them. The one chiefly responsible for the flavor is, you guessed it- vanillin. It can be isolated artificially or naturally, though the end result is more or less the same.
So in simplest terms it is vanilla flavoring. In complex terms for you chemists it is 4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde. Other web info on it is conflicting. On one hand vanillin is supposed to be an irritant (respiratory, skin and digestive wise) dangerous to ingest, and can make people aggressive or give them migraines. If you get any in your mouth you are supposed to rinse it out (that's sure as hell what I did when the burning and bitter taste got me). If heated too much (we're talking hundreds of degrees) chemical changes ensue to make it turn to something like formaldehyde.
On another hand, some people say it's a safe flavoring to add to desserts, drinks, whatever.
They add that lethal amounts to ingest are huge, so as long as you don't pour a pure giant bowl of it and eat it with a spoon you should be good. Further, it is said to be surprisingly anti-carcinogenic (that means it fights cancer if you don't know), and it helps liver problems and enhances libido and so forth. So what the hell am I to believe? One thing's for sure, this shit mildly creeps me out and I think it has powers or benefits to be unlocked that medical research has not scratched deep enough. I shall continue to do my own research on it.
I did a ghetto-ass online translation from Vietnamese to English, and I may say it's quite entertaining, especially the 'manic effect upon horses' part. If it appears non grammatical or weird, remember it was all done SIC.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Translation from package:
aromatic vanillin powder
special
delicious
KLT: 10 tubes
25 mg + -10%
manic effect upon horses
bakery, confectionery. tea brown, pink, etc. ..
Vanilla fragrant powder upon manic performance horses
quality assurance delicious
Manufacturing firms manic agree more products Vani Degree Advanced System Equipment, Machine Packaging Automated Processing etc. ..
Advantages: Do Types Confectionary Sweets, Cooking Tea, Steamed sticky rice, syrup, cream, etc. .. Light Sa
Please preserve the product in cool dry place. The expiry date indicated on the security box
DCSX: 22 Van Than P.8-District 6 City - Tel: 8540854
Certificate KD: 1619 - C / HKD 12-12-00
Mark has been protected by the State Number: 1037
Standard office number: 01/2006
Statement Number: 4180/2006/YT-CNTC
Pure vanilla 96%, 98%
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(66)
-
▼
January
(31)
- Reincarnated: Secrets of Google (originally posted...
- Reincarnated: Junk Mail Spoof (originally posted N...
- Reincarnated: Shadowcatchers (originally posted No...
- Reincarnated: The Corn Pops Cat With The Laser Eye...
- Reincarnated: Proof You Are Now Living In The Matr...
- Reincarnated: Cool Ways To Die (originally posted ...
- Reincarnated: Funny Terrorists Poster (originally ...
- Reincarnated: Problems of the World Today (origina...
- Reincarnated: Why I'm quitting Facebook (originall...
- Reincarnated: Wish You Were Here... (originally po...
- Reincarnated: TOUGH (BADASS) (originally posted Ju...
- Reincarnated: Does This Look Like A Street Drug To...
- Reincarnated: Exemplar Interruptus (originally pos...
- Reincarnated: Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death! (o...
- Reincarnated: Wall Of 'Die!' (originally posted Ju...
- Reincarnated: Transit of Venus (originally posted ...
- Reincarnated: AUDIOPHILE EDITION (originally poste...
- Reincarnated: Next Blog>> (originally posted May 2...
- Reincarnated: FEED THE SOIL! (originally posted Ma...
- Reincarnated: Flood Simulator (originally posted M...
- Reincarnated: By Night~! (originally posted May 2012)
- Reincarnated: Henry Rollins - Be Like The Moon (or...
- Reincarnated: JESUS WAS A PUNK! (originally posted...
- Reincarnated: Cockroaches Are Your Gods ~by Henry ...
- Reincarnated: Disco Hawk (originally posted May 2012)
- Reincarnated: The Loot Is Loose!! (originally post...
- Reincarnated: More fun than drugs... (originally p...
- Reincarnated: Chairing The Member (originally post...
- Reincarnated: The Perry Bible Fellowship (original...
- Reincarnated: 诚信为本, 彻底打消您的 顾虑。精据单! (originally pos...
- Let The Ritual Begin..
-
▼
January
(31)