|  | 
| Jean Shin's Sound Wave art exhibit | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
Ages and ages the debate has raged on, vinyl records or compact discs? Here we are about to delve into the controversy and completely settle it 'for the record' (haha really bad pun).
There are so many factors that go into the final physical and sound  quality of an LP or CD: recording, mastering, manufacturing, care and  maintenance, and so forth. 
Let's make the assumption for the sake of  debate that all CDs and all vinyl records are recorded and mastered and  manufactured and maintained equally, and see how they go toe to toe. 
Vinyl  is clunkier to store, weighs a ton in masses and takes up more space.  This may not be a big deal if you only own like 10 records tops. If you  are a hardcore sound connoisseur, chances are you would be owning  hundreds. On top of that, if you were a DJ, moving all that vinyl from  gig to gig is a healthy recipe for a hernia. For the same weight and  space, you could store about 10 times the amount of CDs (or more). CDs  win for portability and lightness hands down.
Packaging. Start with CDs. Jewel cases? What a joke of a name. As if  they are really as precious as jewels. It's just shitty plastic.  Digipaks? Cardboard. CD packaging, it is to be agreed, sucks as a whole.  Yet look at vinyl. It's mostly cardboard and paper sleeves. Not much  better! Though vinyl packaging is larger and so the artwork stands out a  bit more. Looking at both mediums as a whole..if any packaging REALLY  stands out from the pack, it is more of a question of an individual band  taking the time to do something more artistically appreciable.
Capacity. One CD holds about 79 mins of music. An LP will hold no more than about an hour using BOTH sides, so like averaging about 1/2 hour a side. Talk about clunky. So many double albums with a side A, B, C, and D stretched over two vinyl records can be fit on ONE CD, period.
|  | 
| Amoeba Records | 
Care of your records. CDs get really scratched easily don't they? Only if you don't look after them!
Both vinyl and CDs can have problems with scratches, dust, and other environmental factors if  not well looked after. Preserve and store both well, and CDs still come  out on top.
As far as raw material decomposition, vinyl lasts  longer. But here's the catch. It lasts longer only if NOT PLAYED. A pile  of vinyl stored nicely on a shelf in a cool dark room could last ages  and ages. Even in the landfill...almost immortal! Ha, sounds more  environmental as well don't it, you dirty vinyl licking hippies. 
Yet...what good is music if it's not PLAYED right? 
Play a vinyl record 100 times over, and there's a very high chance all  that needle digging and dust and heat and warping would have degraded the vinyl  itself, and therefore the music itself. Vinyl is a physically  interpreted medium. It can't be read without a literal needle DIGGING right  into its precious flesh.  The chances of well preserved vinyl are only good if you  take impeccable storage measures and are a master audiophile with a well maintained turntable setup that  costs way more than you'd ever like to admit (we're talking stupid, stupid prices here).
|  | 
| by Sorapoison | 
Play a CD 100 times over.  The laser light beam used to read it in no way will contribute to its  physical degradation. CDs stored under good conditions will 'only'  last approx. 50 to several hundred years as rough estimate. Even if they  lasted for the lower number, you'll likely be at geezer hearing  aid stage by then anyhow.  If your vinyl had miraculously survived  countless plays unscathed to  this point, the 'better audio quality' that vinyl purists try to  champion  wouldn't mean shit to those ears that have experienced hearing loss (and  almost no one escapes some form of it once they reach a certain age.)   Even if you maintained your hearing perfectly and  you were ready to have your stereo rock the dentures out of your mouth  it still wouldn't matter. If you were 20something, perfect hearing,  just bought a new vinyl record, ready to play it on a kickass system,  it wouldn't matter. Why? Because vinyl does not have better sound  quality overall. Why?
 Some vinyl diehards will say the sound frequency range of vinyl is roughly 
22Hz-up to 30 kHz.  It is hard to measure specifically, especially in the low end. The  central idea behind vinyl having better sound is that this freq. range  is more broad than CD range.
Ok. The human hearing frequency range is from 20 Hz – 20 kHz.    Audio CD range is from 2 Hz-22,050 Hz. What this means is the CD range  is 18 Hz lower than the lowest range of human hearing and 2,050 Hz above  the highest range of human hearing. Sounds we cannot even hear are well  covered by CD. We may not hear these sounds but feel them as  vibrations (probably more in the low end with the volume CRANKED..and most of the vibrations one would feel would be within the normal hearing range even so.) Some music hardcores will say feeling these vibrations in  our bodies would be all part of the grand listening experience. The  bottom range of vinyl is slightly short of our full bass range of  hearing. That's WORSE than CD! Or, it is beyond it.. like CD range. It's  debatable. As far as the high end, the range is way higher than that of  CD even. But we won't really notice these vibrations in a huge way at  all, especially compared to the bass end ones. In fact, these could be  just as well 100% nonexistent frequencies for all we would know and  experience. 

 
One camp will say it is a total myth that vinyl has better sound  range than CDs, and that CDs have a better overall dynamic range. A lot  of it is placebo effect. Ok, for the sake of argument let's say that  it's true that vinyl DOES have a better range than CDs, it still doesn't  discount the fact that any extra frequencies would be barely (if at  ALL) noticed by ANYONE. The more noticeable frequencies picked up as  vibrations would be closer to what's within the CD range, not some  frequencies miles and miles out.
Also, the freq. response in vinyl degrades with the wear and tear with  the record itself...the more it is played and not stored correctly or  cared for. That right, it's not just a question of clicks and pops on  well aged and used vinyl, the ENTIRE sound frequency response degrades!!
It's also probably more likely that limitations will show up if you  
convert vinyl, which is analogue, into digital formats (ie mp3s). With  
CDs ripped as lossless tracks, there seems to be no real quality loss  
present.
The converting from vinyl to digital is not always so simple, which is why all vinyl should come with free digital downloads of the tracks, 
but not all of it does. With CDs you can rip the tracks to 
virtually any type of digital file at any quality you choose in mere minutes.
Price wise, vinyl is a joke. Unless you are willing to get it used  in a cheapies bin, which would mean good chance of wear and tear and  worse sound. 
Brand new vinyl typically costs FOUR times more than  CDs, all items found from the best available price sources. It's a rich  man's game. There was a time when vinyl and tapes were the norm, and CDs  were just coming out. THAT was a time vinyl was way cheaper brand new,  but unless you build a time machine, vinyl remains this niche  collector's thing (making a real comeback) YET at a ridiculous price. CDs themselves are  overpriced for what they are, so imagine how criminal it is that vinyl  should cost even more!
Availability is another issue. To just get  a bit of this and that, sure, whatever. Yet isn't vinyl supposed to be mainly  for serious collectors? Serious collectors really go all out to get a  zillion and one releases if they can help it. You'll only be able to get  something like 20% of the albums you can get on CD. Some albums never  even make it out as vinyl even once! Sure, there's always the flipside of the odd obscure record you can only find on vinyl that never made it to CD or is no longer on CD, but good luck hunting it down, and overall there are way more albums in CD form than vinyl, especially if you are talking about fairly modern music. 
UPDATE: Was just reading another article that mentioned 
COLORED vinyl wears down faster than normal vinyl. So it's a cool visual collector's item but degrades quicker. ALSO the article stated that most new vinyl releases and re-issues are sourced from DIGITAL material, so all that analogue wonderfulness is basically lost from the get-go, and people are getting tricked into buying vinyl thinking it's so much better!!
*******************************
Outro/The Only Defense of Vinyl:
To be fair, vinyl has only  one thing going for it that makes it 'better' than CDs. It can only be  described as 'vinyl magic'. Vinyl magic is a certain fun factor, a  warmth of sound, an experience. Because vinyl is analogue, the sound is  perceived to be more 'warm'. This works pretty well for a lot of vintage  classic rock albums, say. Because at the time... the stuff was recorded  on shittier equipment, played on shittier equipment, and so forth. So a  warmer sound is more complimentary and gives a more authentic feeling  that you are transported back in time. Some crazy electronica album from  last year? NO real proof that it'll sound better with that warm vinyl  sound. It may actually sound worse. It's kinda like how if you watched  old black and white movies on a shitty old TV set, it would have more  charm to it instead of some super HD plasma flatscreen. 
It's fun to listen to vinyl, to pull the record out, smell it,  viscerally put it on. Play with the pitch shifting and speed (though  that may wear the record down faster).
Dusty crusty clicks and pops?  Maybe they too are part of vinyl magic, the experience and for some,  nostalgia. Vinyl also tends to force one to actually sit back and relax  and listen to a whole album in order, the way it was meant to be. Get up  to flip to side B..that's the only interruption. Maybe well due. A  drink and piss break. No shuffled playlists. No quick kills. An  experience. More organic maybe? Let the ashes fall on the sleeve. Let  smoke and sound waves fill the air. The artwork is more likely to be  appreciated if it's larger. These kind of things, they are all part of  vinyl magic. But if you are getting vinyl convinced it'll prolly never  wear out, it has better overall sound than CDs, you don't like messes,  you are lying to yourself about how cheap it is, and so forth (basically  any reasons outside of true 'vinyl magic') then DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME!  CDs are better!! Don't kid yourself! CDs beat Vinyl! Actually, in the end, I end up buying both depending on what seems to work best for a given moment!
*see also: 
http://fox-actors.blogspot.com/2011/08/why-i-still-buy-records-or.html
|  | 
| It's vinyl magic... |